| |
|
Let Java retire from the spotlight of web applications in dignity |
|
|
|
Written by Content Team
|
|
Jan 31, 2006 at 12:00 AM |
|
Page 5 of 5 |
Comment by Noname on 2006-01-31 00:21:14
JBoss should acquire Rails. The talk sounds very similar. Rails people are slightly more humble.
If David was from JBoss he would have said "Ruby and Rails will rule web application development for the next decade" :) |
Comment by Noname on 2006-02-01 22:27:46
David Heinemeier Hansson >> Again, I think of the "Enterprise" label as an excuse to deliver expensive and painful software over budget and late.
WHAT !!!
Ok,
PHP or Rails ??
:grin |
Comment by Noname on 2006-02-02 04:49:16
Most Java developers think that the world starts and ends with Java. Don't worry, your Momma will be around in the years to come but if you want to become a man, look around, experiment, open your eyes and your mind - you won't repent it nor will you loose anything. Grow up man! |
Comment by Noname on 2006-02-10 21:30:03
noname wrote: "has Cobol faded away?"
to that i say "yes it really has. java will too, unless it catches up." php and coldfusion are dying and python is starting to miss the boat too.
the software industry is gonna shift very quickly -- if you're not going to change with it, then you're going to be babysitting somebody's database or report-generator intranet application until you retire. if you don't mind doing that, then by all means... |
Comment by Noname on 2006-02-01 01:06:59
Some years down the line Java developers should not complain that they were not fore-warned. Change (Rails or something equivalent) is the only constant. Java would be around for sure but those who latch on to a newer (and better?) technology would be seen, heard and better paid. Choice is yours. |
Comment by Noname on 2006-02-01 01:22:58
Bruce Tate is an idiot capitalizing on an acronym. Maybe the devoted quoter up above can go look to see where Tate makes most of his money. In Java. OReilly is more than happy to go along for the ride because it makes them money. DHH, we won't give a crap about you in a year because you're about as important as a fart in the hurricane.
What's most annoying is that DHH is that tries to qualify his importance by detracting from Java OVER and OVER again. Do you hear Gosling slamming Stroustrup? No. But that's not even a fair comparison. DHH with ROR slamming Java is like street hot dog vendor slamming a 5 star restuarant.
HA HA HA! Wow, that analogy is so correct I have to pat myself on the back.
Enjoy those 15 minutes! |
Comment by Noname on 2006-02-01 22:26:02
I like Ruby on Rails. In fact, my video podcast - [URL=http://www.northeastskipodcast.com]Northeast Ski Podcast[/URL] runs on ROR, and I'm very happy with the flexibility - adding features both controllers, models and views and expanding database schema as needed. In fact I believe Java doen't have its place in the fast paced Web apps world: PHP maybe. But it's really spaghetti code. Ruby comes out of the noble origins of the Open Source, not the dark and cold corporate bunkers. |
Comment by 'Guest' on 2006-10-12 04:39:17
How to use the java enterprise media beans
in J2ee
|
Comment by Anonymous on 2008-09-06 22:00:30
Last comment was 2 years and 7 months ago. There is now Groovy on Grails. It works like Ruby on Rails except it is written in Java; compiles to Jave bytecode; allows embedded Java. As best I can tell at this point it does everything RoR does. Doesn't this change thing? |
|
|
|
|
Home | 
